Assessing the risk is simply judging how likely harm is and how bad it would be, then deciding sensible controls. This page keeps it short and practical.
It’s a sensible look at what could cause harm, who might be harmed and how, how likely/serious it could be, and what you’ll do about it. The output is a short record and a set of practical controls that people will actually follow.
Keep it clear and brief: list hazards, who’s at risk and how, your controls, owners/dates, and the risk rating before and after controls.
Likelihood is how often it might happen; impact is how bad it would be. Multiply or cross‑reference them to get a risk level that drives action.
Use a 3×3 for quick decisions, or 5×5 when you need finer bands. Keep definitions short and observable (e.g., “once per year”, “first‑aid only”).

Action cues: Low – accept with routine controls; monitor. Medium – improve controls; assign owner/date. High – don’t proceed until further reduction is in place.
Assign an owner and date for new measures so things actually get done.
| Hazard | Who might be harmed & how | Existing controls | Further measures | Risk before | Risk after | Owner & date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slips on wet foyer floor | Visitors & staff – bruises/fractures | Entrance mats; wet‑floor signs | Increase mat coverage; hourly spill checks; fix door drip | Medium | Low | J. Smith – 15 Oct |
| Hot liquids in kitchenette | Staff – burns | Kettle safety switch; posted guidance | Lidded flasks for transport; “no open cups in corridors” added to induction | Medium | Low | A. Patel – 30 Sep |
Score “before/after” using your chosen matrix. Keep your team on a single scale and set of definitions.
A hazard is something that can cause harm. A risk is the chance that harm occurs and how severe it could be.
Not always. A 3×3 covers many cases and is quicker. Use 5×5 when you need finer discrimination. Pick one and stick with it.
Yes. Build your assessment in the wizard and export a branded PDF. You can try the tool without creating an account.
No. This is general guidance. You’re responsible for completeness and accuracy and must follow local regulations and your organisation’s policies.